Results of the Field Monitoring Exercise Report Prepared by the World Bank with Cooperation from the Federal Ministry of Finance December 2006 Introduction On February 7, 2005 the Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland authorized the repatriation by Switzerland to Nigeria of funds deposited by the Abacha family in Switzerland. Switzerland is the first country to repatriate to Nigeria funds looted by earlier military administrations. The actual repatriation took place in two tranches – in September and November of 2005 (US$461.3 mn) and (mostly) in the 1 st quarter of 2006 ($44.1 mn). The total amount received by the Federal Government of Nigeria was equivalent to $505.5 mn. In a letter to His Excellency, The Ambassador of Switzerland to Nigeria dated January 9, 2005 the Federal Ministry of Finance (FMF) explained that the US$500m (NGN 65 billion) of Abacha Looted Funds was programmed into and utilized in the 2004 budget. The FMF further clarified that, partly in anticipation of the repatriation of the recovered (looted) funds from Switzerland and in line with its comprehensive economic reform program (NEEDS), the Government increased its outlays to key sectors in the 2004 budget. A major objective of the budget was to target specific sectors that could move the country towards achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). These sectors include Health, Education, Water, Electricity and Roads and it was commonly understood that repatriated Abacha funds would be spent within these 5 sectors, mostly on new and ongoing investment projects. As a part of repatriation process, the Nigerian and Swiss Governments, and the World Bank, agreed for a study to be carried out to analyze the use of the repatriated funds, particularly in terms of the contribution for these funds to the NEEDS as part of a review of public expenditures to be carried out by Nigeria and the Bank under the Country Partnership Strategy. This report is prepared in line with those earlier agreements. The report objective was to verify that additional budget resources went to the agreed development projects and were effectively utilized for achieving the government’s development goals. The report has not sought to substitute for a regular government audit of its budget spending. The monitoring and analysis of repatriated fund utilization was undertaken at two levels: a) macro – through analysis of general budget expenditure trends, and b) micro – through a field survey of randomly selected projects, funded under this budget program. Utilization of Funds in the Government Capital Budgets An analysis of actual federal budget spending in five MDG sectors for 2003-05 suggests a considerable increase in the 2004 capital expenditure relative to its 2003 level (Figure 1). A significant portion of this increase could be attributed to additional funds, made available under the repatriation program. Moreover, the trend of rapid expansion in budget spending in these sectors was sustained in 2005. Spending increased in all five sectors. 
The following Table presents the data on actual allocation of recovered funds across the five sectors, which utilized repatriated Abacha funds, and main programs within these sectors. The data was compiled based on the full list of projects covered by the program. The Table allows a comparison with the preliminary information on sectoral allocation of funds, as provided in the FMF’s letter of January 9, 2005. Utilization of Repatriated Abacha Funds No. | Sector | Allocation, based on preliminary information (NGN bn) | Funds Accounted for via Projects List (NGN bn) | 1. | Power o/w: Rural Electrification Power Generation | 21.70  | 21.94 8.10 13.84 | 2. | Works Priority Economic Roads |  18.60 |  17.06 | 3. | Health o/w: Primary Health Care Vaccination Programs | 10.83 | 10.84 2.02 8.82 | 4. | Basic and Secondary Education o/w: Primary Schools Junior Secondary Schools Federal Govt Colleges | 7.74  | 7.79 3.16 3.40 1.23 | 5. | Water Potable Water & Rural Irrigation |  6.20 |  7.53 |  |  TOTALS |  65.07 |  65.16 |
 |