WASHINGTON, June 24, 2008 — This year’s updated version of the Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) compiled by World Bank researchers shows many developing country governments making important gains in control of corruption, and some of them matching rich country performance in overall governance measures. “Some countries are making rapid progress in governance, including in Africa, showing that a measure of ‘Afro-optimism’ is called for”, said Daniel Kaufmann, co-author of the report and Director of Governance at the World Bank Institute, while acknowledging that the data also shows large variation in performance across countries, and even among neighbors within each continent. “Progress reflects reforms in those countries where political leaders, policymakers, civil society and the private sector view good governance and corruption control as crucial for sustained and shared growth.” Good governance can be found at all income levels, with some emerging economies matching the performance of rich countries on key dimensions of governance. Over a dozen emerging countries, including Slovenia, Chile, Botswana, Estonia, Uruguay, Czech Republic, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Mauritius, and Costa Rica score higher on key dimensions of governance than industrialized countries such as Greece or Italy. And in many cases these differences are statistically significant. Over 2002-2007, the Indicators show sharp improvements in governance, along with reversals. Examples include strong improvements in Voice and Accountability in countries such as Ukraine and Haiti; improvements in Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism in Argentina; and improvements in Control of Corruption in Georgia and Tanzania. But despite governance gains in some countries, overall quality of governance around the world has not improved much over the past decade. Coinciding with countries that have done well, a similar number have experienced deteriorations in several governance dimensions, including Zimbabwe, Cote D’Ivoire, Belarus, Eritrea and Venezuela. In many other countries, no significant change in either direction is yet apparent in recent years. The Indicators suggest that where there is commitment to reform, improvements in governance can and do occur. Over the past decade from 1998-2007, countries in all regions have shown substantial improvements in governance, even if at times starting from a very low level. Examples include:
• Ghana, Indonesia, Liberia and Peru in Voice and Accountability;
• Rwanda, Algeria and Angola in Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism;
• Afghanistan, Serbia and Ethiopia in Government Effectiveness;
• Georgia and the Democratic Republic of Congo in Regulatory Quality;
• Tajikistan in Rule of Law; and
• Liberia and Serbia in Control of Corruption. "The WGI and other efforts to measure are useful in prompting public discussion of governance challenges and successes" said Aart Kraay, coauthor of the WGI and lead economist in the Development Research Group of the World Bank. "But at the same time, discussions of governance based on empirical measures need to be realistic about the limits of existing data. In this respect it is important that users take seriously the margins of error reported in the WGI, which reflect the inherent difficulties in measuring governance using any kind of data." This year’s study is the seventh update of the WGI, a decade-long effort by the researchers to build and update the most comprehensive cross-country set of governance indicators currently available. The newly released set of the six updated aggregate indicators, as well as data from the underlying sources, are at www.govindicators.org. The Indicators cover 212 countries and territories, drawing on 35 different data sources to capture the views of tens of thousands of survey respondents worldwide, as well as thousands of experts in the private, NGO, and public sectors. The WGI are used by policymakers and civil society groups worldwide as a tool to assess governance challenges and monitor reforms, and by scholars researching the causes and consequences of good governance. Better governance helps in the fight against poverty and improves living standards. Research over the past decade shows that improved governance raises development, and not the other way around. When governance is improved by one standard deviation, infant mortality declines by two-thirds and incomes rise about three-fold in the long run. Such an improvement in governance is within reach, since it is a fraction of the difference between the worst and best performers. For example, in the dimension of Rule of Law, one standard deviation is all that separates the very low ratings of Somalia or Afghanistan from countries such as Kenya and Bolivia; or what separates these countries from countries such as Ghana or Egypt; or in turn what separates Ghana or Egypt from Portugal or Estonia; or what separates these from the best performers such as Denmark or Switzerland. Good governance has also been found to significantly enhance the effectiveness of development assistance in general, and of World Bank-funded projects in particular. "Until the mid-nineties, I did not think that governance could be measured. The Worldwide Governance Indicators have shown me otherwise” says Shlomo Yitzhaki, Director of Israel’s Central Bureau of Statistics and Professor of Economics at the Hebrew University. "It constitutes the state of the art on how to build periodic governance indicators which can be a crucial tool for policy analysts and decision-makers benchmarking their countries. Uniquely, it publicly discloses the aggregated and disaggregated data, as well as the estimated margins of error for each country. It definitely sets a standard for transparency in data." ###
The full “Governance Matters VII” paper, the synthesis of the main findings, and the new WGI data update are available at: http://www.govindicators.org. The WGI do not reflect the official views of the World Bank, its Executive Directors, or the
countries they represent. The WGI are not used by the World Bank Group to allocate resources.
Worldwide Governance Indicators
1998 – 2007
ALBANIA
Albania this year has seen continued improvement in all six governance indicators, with the highest achievements in Regulatory Quality and Voice & Accountability where Albania now ranks on or above the 50th percentile. The largest improvement was seen in Control of Corruption – Albania jump from 20th to 37th percentile between 2006 and 2007, but this ranks below neighboring countries and the regional average. Also slightly improved since last year, Albania continues to perform most poorly on Rule of Law indicator, a trend since 1998.
1. Voice and Accountability. Since 1998, when Albania ranked in the 37th percentile, the country has made a significant improvement through 2007 with a new ranking equivalent to or higher than 50 percent of the 212 countries. However, Albania remains slightly behind neighboring countries, including Montenegro, Macedonia, Bosnia – Herzegovina, and Serbia and below the regional average 2. Political Stability. In 2007, Albania have been made improvements in the indicator on Political Stability, leaving now 34.6% of the countries behind.). In comparison with the neighboring countries, only Montenegro recorded a higher indicator on political stability than Albania, while the others like Bosnia – Herzegovina, Macedonia and Serbia are falling behind. However, the country lags considerably behind the Eastern Europe and Baltic regional average which is at the 55th percentile. 3. Government Effectiveness. So far, Albania has been experiencing gradual improvements in this indicator and this year reached the 43rd percentile, although it remains behind the Eastern Europe and Baltic regional average. It should be noted while Albania has seen improvement in this indicator, the broader Europe and Central Asia region on average have improved this year. Nevertheless, Macedonia, Serbia and Montenegro are all performing better than Albania, while Bosnia – Herzegovina remains behind. 4. Regulatory Quality. There has been considerable improvement in the indicator on Regulatory Quality compared to last year in which Albania continues to rank best, at the 56th percentile, among all the indicators and ahead of all the neighboring countries, including Bosnia – Herzegovina, Montenegro, Serbia, and Macedonia. The Eastern Europe and Baltic regional average is 68th percentile 5. Rule of Law. Albania continues not to score well in Rule of Law. This indicator continues to be the worst performing indicator and relatively small improvements have not helped Albania to move very far from the “red” zone (0 - 25% percentile). In 2007, only 28% of the countries rated worse. Albania remains far behind the Eastern Europe and Baltic average (54%) for this category. Serbia, Montenegro, Bosnia – Herzegovina and Macedonia are all performing considerably better than Albania in this category, which also lags behind the average of Low and Middle Income countries. 6. Control of Corruption. The largest improvement was seen in Control of Corruption – Albania jump from 20th to 37th percentile between 2006 and 2007. However, despite this improvement, Albania only ranks lower than the ECA average, the Eastern Europe and Baltic average (57%) and that for the neighboring countries. Albania continues to performing considerably worse then Serbia, Bosnia – Herzegovina, Macedonia, and Montenegro. |
RSS