| . |
DIR | | INVESTIGATION |
| | | |
INT in consultation with the borrower government and Country management unit | 1 Initiative | INT |
| | | |
Diagnostic | 2 Nature | Formal investigation |
| | | |
Request for assessment of vulnerability to fraud and corruption of one or more projects in discussion with the Bank’s Region and/or Country management | 3 Based on | Allegation from Bank staff, beneficiary, company/NGO, government official, anonymous |
| | | |
Projects in a country and/or sector are selected for review in the context of a past INT investigation or because a need has been identified for stronger procurement, financial or project implementation controls | 4 Selection | A case is prioritized, in consultation with the Country team, based on multiple criteria. Only High and Medium Priority cases have been investigated |
| | | |
All contracts of the project, independent of observed irregularities | 5 Scope | The specific acts covered by the allegation, as well as additional evidence that may emerge over the course of the investigation |
| | | |
Assess the likelihood of fraud, corruption and mismanagement in Bank-financed projects, assess the “where and why” of control weaknesses, and offer recommendations | 6 Objective | Determine whether an allegation is substantiated, unsubstantiated or unfounded and recommend follow-up actions by the relevant Bank management and borrower government |
| | | |
Data collection, analysis and review of procurement contracts, financial management activities, and implementation activities | 7 Process | Preliminary (desktop) inquiry followed by a full investigation |
| | | |
DIR report with findings of fraud and corruption indicators and risks and recommendations for improvement of controls to the Bank, the relevant country government and relevant donors | 8 Outputs | In case of substantiated allegation: final investigative report to Regional/Country office; proposed Notice of Sanctions Proceedings; and referral report to the borrowing government/other donor |
| | | |
Assistance to operational staff and the borrower government in improving project design, implementation and supervision | 9 Outcomes | Sanctioning of corrupt and/or fraudulent companies creating a deterrent effect |
| | | |
Investigations, project design improvements, and operational institutionalization of risk mitigation measures. | 10 Follow-up | Operational team in its ongoing dialogue with the borrowing government discusses recommendations made in referral reports. |
| | | |
| |
  REPORT fraud, corruption or staff misconduct |