|
|
|
Transport and Poverty
|
|
 |
 |
| Evaluation Highlights | - Both urban and rural poverty can be reduced when transport improves accessibility and affordability for the poor.
- The distributional impact of transport projects is underresearched.
- Regardless of who implements the project (communities or works departments), sustainability remains a major issue.
- Pro-poor passenger transport pricing needs more attention for accessible transport to reach the poorest.
- In fragile states the risks of intervention are high, but the returns can sometimes be substantial.
- Where there is low institutional capacity, Bank staff tend to underestimate the time needed to implement reforms, build capacity, and build institutions.
|
Table 6.1: Distribution of Urban Projects and Components, Closed and Active (1995-2005) | | | 1995-2000 | 2001-06 | 1995-2006 | Total number of urban projects | 41 | 37 | 78 | Components | 78 | 77 | 155 | Urban roads | 27 | 24 | 51 | Traffic management and safety | 10 | 9 | 19 | Institutional, regulatory, and planning | 12 | 19 | 31 | Nonmotorized transport, urban poor | 7 | 7 | 14 | Urban environment, air quality | 3 | 3 | 6 | Public transport | 19 | 15 | 34 | | Source: World Bank data. |
|
|
|
|
|
|