Click here for search results
Online Media Briefing Cntr
Embargoed news for accredited journalists only.
Login / Register

World Bank Researchers Release Worldwide Governance Indicators 1996-2006

Available in: Français, العربية, 中文, Español, русский
Press Release No:2007/009/WBI

Contacts: In Washington : Sunetra Puri, 202-473-2049

spuri1@worldbank.org

Michael Jones, 202-473-7660;

  mjones2@worldbank.org

WASHINGTON, July 10, 2007 — The report, Governance Matters, 2007: Worldwide Governance Indicators 1996-2006 being launched today by the World Bank Institute and the World Bank Development Economics Vice-presidency, shows that a number of countries - including in Africa - are making progress in improving governance and fighting corruption.  This is encouraging given that good governance and corruption control are fundamental for long-term growth and reducing poverty.

“The hopeful news is that a considerable number of countries, including in Africa, are showing that it is possible to make significant governance progress in a relatively short period of time. Such improvements in governance are critical for aid effectiveness and for sustained long-run growth.”  says Daniel Kaufmann, co-author of the report and Director of Global Programs at the World Bank Institute “Bribery around the world is estimated at about US $1 trillion dollars, and the burden of corruption falls disproportionately on the bottom billion people living in extreme poverty,”

The report, authored by the World Bank’s Daniel Kaufmann, Aart Kraay and Massimo Mastruzzi, builds on research on the importance of governance and its impact on development over the past decade.  Good governance matters for other human development outcomes such as infant mortality, illiteracy, and inequality, as well.  Good governance has also been found to significantly enhance the effectiveness of development assistance in general, and of World Bank funded projects in particular. 

Measuring countries' governance performance, and their improvements over time, is thus a key item on the governance agenda.  But it is also a complex challenge, as governance has many dimensions, each with inherent measurement challenges.  The Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) project shows how this challenge can be met.

“The Governance Indicators put to rest the tired assertion that these issues cannot be robustly measured and the lessons drawn cannot be put to subsequent positive use by governments, the development community, civil society and the media,” says John Githongo, former Permanent Secretary for Governance & Ethics in Kenya’s Office of the President.      

This year’s report represents a decade-long effort by the researchers to build and update the most comprehensive cross-country set of governance indicators currently available to the public.  The aggregate indicators as well as data from the underlying sources are available at a newly-redesigned website at www.govindicators.org.  The indicators cover 212 countries and territories, drawing on 33 different data sources to capture the views of tens of thousands of survey respondents worldwide, as well as thousands of experts in the private, NGO, and public sectors.

"Until the mid-nineties, I did not think that governance could be measured.  The Worldwide Governance Indicators have shown me otherwise” says Shlomo Yitzhaki, Director of Israel’s Central Bureau of Statistics and Professor of Economics at the Hebrew University. "It constitutes the state of the art on how to build periodic governance indicators which can be a crucial tool for policy analysts and decision-makers benchmarking their countries.  Uniquely, it publicly discloses the aggregated and disaggregated data, as well as the estimated margins of error for each country. It definitely sets a standard for transparency in data."

The report shows that:

Some African countries are making significant strides on the path to good governance. Over the period from 1998 to 2006, Kenya, Niger, Sierra Leone have shown marked recent improvements in Voice and Accountability, while Algeria and Liberia have strengthened their Rule of Law.  Countries like Algeria, Angola Libya, Rwanda and Sierra Leone have made improvements in Political Stability and Tanzania has recorded gains on Control of Corruption. The report also shows however that other African countries still face enormous governance and development challenges.

Emerging economies are matching rich countries on key dimensions of governance.   Over a dozen developing countries such as Slovenia, Chile, Botswana, Estonia, Uruguay, Czech Republic, Latvia, Lithuania, and Costa Rica score higher on key dimensions of governance than industrialized countries such as Greece or Italy.

Improving governance helps fight poverty and improves standards of living. 10 years of research show that improved standards of living are largely the result of improved governance, and not the other way around.   When governance is improved by one standard deviation, infant mortality declines by two-thirds and incomes rise about three-fold in the long run.  Such an improvement is within reach as it is just a fraction of the difference between the worst and best performers. For example, in the dimension of Rule of Law, one standard deviation is all that separates the extremely low rating of Somalia from Cote D’Ivoire, or Cote D’Ivoire from El Salvador, or El Salvador from Italy or Botswana, and Botswana from the United Kingdom.

Where there is commitment to reform, improvements in governance can take place relatively quickly. While not the norm, a number of countries have made significant progress even in the very brief five-year period since 2002, as for example in Ukraine, Kenya, and Liberia in Voice and Accountability; and Angola and Algeria in Political Stability.

On average the quality of governance around the world has not improved much over the past decade, despite individual country improvements.  For the countries that have done well, there have been a similar number that have experienced deteriorations in a number of governance dimensions, including Zimbabwe, Cote D’Ivoire, Belarus and Venezuela.  And in many other countries no significant change in either direction is yet apparent.

 

Background Information

 

This is the sixth update of the Worldwide Governance Indicators, reflecting work over the past decade to develop evidence-based measures that help development stakeholders track the quality of institutions, support capacity building, improve governance, and address corruption.

The WGI measure the following six components of good governance:

 

1.       Voice and Accountability – measuring the extent to which a country's citizens are able to participate in selecting their government, as well as freedom of expression, freedom of association, and a free media.

2.       Political Stability and Absence of Violence – measuring perceptions of the likelihoood that the government will be destabilized or overthrown by unconstitutional or violent means, including terrorism

3.       Government Effectiveness  – measuring the quality of public services, the quality of the civil service and the degree of its independence from political pressures, the quality of policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of the government's commitment to such policies

4.       Regulatory Quality – measuring the ability of the government to formulate and implement sound policies and regulations that permit and promote private sector development

5.       Rule of Law  – measuring the extent to which agents have confidence in and abide by the rules of society, and in particular the quality of contract enforcement, the police, and the courts, as well as the likelihood of crime and violence

6.       Control of Corruption – measuring the extent to which public power is exercised for private gain, including both petty and grand forms of corruption, as well as "capture" of the state by elites and private interests

"Measuring governance poses unique challenges.  Governance is complex and has many different aspects, and so no single indicator can fully capture a country's governance performance" says Aart Kraay, Lead Economist in the World Bank's Development Research Group, and co-author of the report. "It is  therefore important to draw on the wide variety of data sources on governance currently available.  The Worldwide Governance Indicators are a way of collecting and summarizing this wealth of information, based on the experiences and insights of stakeholders worldwide.





Permanent URL for this page: http://go.worldbank.org/NMTQS0JN30