Section V. Annexes16
Annex I (i). Individual Evaluations Consultant¬タルs name: _________________________ | | | Evaluators | | | Criteria/Sub-Criteria | Maximum Scores | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Average Scores | | Experience | | | | | | | | | - | | | | | | | | | - | | | | | | | | | - | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Methodology | | | | | | | | | - | | | | | | | | | - | | | | | | | | | - | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Key Staff | | | | | | | | | - | | | | | | | | | - | | | | | | | | | - | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Transfer of Knowledge (Traininga) | | | | | | | | | - | | | | | | | | | - | | | | | | | | | - | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Participation by Nationalsa | | | | | | | | | - | | | | | | | | | - | | | | | | | | | - | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total | 100 | | | | | | | | a. If specified in the RFP |
1. Evaluator's Name: ______________________ Signature: __________________ Date: _________ 2. Evaluator's Name: ______________________ Signature: __________________ Date: _________ 3. Evaluator's Name: ______________________ Signature: __________________ Date: _________ 4. Evaluator's Name: ______________________ Signature: __________________ Date: _________ 5. Evaluator's Name: ______________________ Signature: __________________ Date: _________
Annex I(ii) Individual Evaluations--Key PersonnelConsultant--Name: ____________________________ | Key Staff Namesa | Maximum Scores | General Qualifications ( )b | Adequacy for the Assignment ( )b | Experience in Region ( )b | Total Marks (100) | Scores | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total | | | | | | | | a. Sometimes evaluations are made by groups instead of individuals. Each group (e.g. financial group) has a weight. The group score is obtained by the weighted scores of the members of the group. For example, the score of a group of three individuals scoring a, b, and c would be ax + by + cz with x, y, and z representing the respective weights of the members (x + y + z = 1) in this group. b. Maximum marks as per RFP |
Name of Evaluator: _______________ Signature: _________________ Date: ___________
Annex II. Information Data Monitoring 5.1 Loan/credit/grant (a) number(b) date of effectiveness(c) closing date (i) original (ii) revised | _________________________ _________________________ _________________________ _________________________ _________________________ | | 5.2 General Procurement Notice (a) first issue date (b) latest update | _________________________ _________________________ | | 5.3 Request for expressions of interest:17 (a) publication in United Nations Development Business (UNDB) (b) publication in national local newspaper(s) | Date _________________________ Name of newspaper(s) and date(s) _________________________ | | 5.4 Did the use of price as a factor of selection change the final ranking?18 | Yes ____ No ____ | | 5.5 Did the use of "local input" as a factor of selection change the technical ranking?19 | Yes ____ No ____ |
Annex III. Minutes of Public Opening of Financial Proposals20 MINUTES [The minutes should indicate the names of the participants in the proposal opening session, the proposal prices, discounts, technical scores, and any details that the Client, at its discretion, may consider appropriate. All attendees must sign the Minutes.]
Annex IV. Request for Proposals21
[A Standard Request for Proposals must be used for World Bank-financed contracts in excess of US$200,000. The Bank also recommends the use of the Standard Request for Proposals document for smaller contracts to simplify its prior review (i.e., when the Borrower cannot issue the document without the Bank's no-objection). The Standard Request for Proposals is available on the Bank's Internet site (http://www.worldbank.org/html/opr/procure/conspage.html) and in the Bank InfoShop at the following address: The World Bank InfoShop 701 18th Street, N.W. Rm. J 1-060 Washington, D.C. 20433, U.S.A. 1.202.458-5454 books@worldbank.org].
Annex V. Miscellaneous Annexes--Ad Hoc
 Section IV. | Bid Document Home 
Footnotes: 16. Annex I applies to Quality-Based, Fixed-Budget and Least-Cost. For Qualifications and Single-Source, it is replaced by a review of the strengths and weaknesses of the proposal, which may be amended by one or several evaluators. 17. Required for large contracts (see Guidelines). 18. Compare technical rank with rank in Form IVC. 19. Figure out technical scores with and without ¬タワlocal input¬タン (Form IIB). 20. Annex III applies to QCBS, Fixed-Budget, and Least-Cost. 21. Annex IV applies to all selection procedures (The Bank Standard Request for Proposals may be used for Qualifications and Single-Source, with appropriate modifications).
|