Click here for search results

Consultant: Form Evaluation Rpt - Section V

Section V. Annexes16
Annex I. Individual Evaluations
Form V Annex I(i). Individual Evaluations
Form V Annex I(ii). Individual Evaluations--Key Personnel
Annex II. Information Data Monitoring 

Annex III. Minutes of Public Opening of Financial Proposals

Annex IV. Request for Proposals

Annex V. Miscellaneous Annexes--Ad Hoc


Annex I (i). Individual Evaluations

Consultant¬タルs name: _________________________
 

  
Evaluators
 
Criteria/Sub-Criteria
Maximum Scores
1
2
3
4
5
Average Scores
Experience             
-             
-             
-             
               
Methodology             
-             
-             
-             
               
Key Staff             
-             
-             
-             
               
Transfer of Knowledge (Traininga)             
-             
-             
-             
               
Participation by Nationalsa             
-             
-             
-             
               
Total
100
           
a. If specified in the RFP

 

1. Evaluator's Name: ______________________ Signature: __________________ Date: _________

2. Evaluator's Name: ______________________ Signature: __________________ Date: _________

3. Evaluator's Name: ______________________ Signature: __________________ Date: _________

4. Evaluator's Name: ______________________ Signature: __________________ Date: _________

5. Evaluator's Name: ______________________ Signature: __________________ Date: _________



Annex I(ii) Individual Evaluations--Key Personnel

Consultant--Name: ____________________________
 

Key Staff Namesa
Maximum Scores
General Qualifications 

( )b

Adequacy 
for the Assignment

( )b

Experience in Region

( )b

Total Marks 

(100)

Scores
             

 

           

 

           

 

           

 

           

 

           

 

           
Total       
a. Sometimes evaluations are made by groups instead of individuals. Each group (e.g. financial group) has a weight. The group score is obtained by the weighted scores of the members of the group. For example, the score of a group of three individuals scoring a, b, and c would be ax + by + cz with x, y, and z representing the respective weights of the members (x + y + z = 1) in this group.

b. Maximum marks as per RFP


 

Name of Evaluator: _______________ Signature: _________________ Date: ___________



Annex II. Information Data Monitoring

 
5.1 Loan/credit/grant 
(a) number
(b) date of effectiveness
(c) closing date
(i) original
(ii) revised

_________________________
_________________________
_________________________
_________________________
_________________________
5.2 General Procurement Notice
(a) first issue date
(b) latest update

_________________________
_________________________
5.3 Request for expressions of interest:17
(a) publication in United Nations Development Business (UNDB)
(b) publication in national local newspaper(s)
 

Date _________________________

Name of newspaper(s) and date(s) 
_________________________
 
 

5.4 Did the use of price as a factor of selection change the final ranking?18Yes ____ No ____
5.5 Did the use of "local input" as a factor of selection change the technical ranking?19
Yes ____ No ____

 

Annex III. Minutes of Public Opening of Financial Proposals20
 

MINUTES

[The minutes should indicate the names of the participants in the proposal opening session, the proposal prices, discounts, technical scores, and any details that the Client, at its discretion, may consider appropriate.

All attendees must sign the Minutes.]



Annex IV. Request for Proposals21

 


[A Standard Request for Proposals must be used for World Bank-financed contracts in excess of US$200,000. The Bank also recommends the use of the Standard Request for Proposals document for smaller contracts to simplify its prior review (i.e., when the Borrower cannot issue the document without the Bank's no-objection). The Standard Request for Proposals is available on the Bank's Internet site (http://www.worldbank.org/html/opr/procure/conspage.html) and in the Bank InfoShop at the following address:

The World Bank InfoShop
701 18th Street, N.W.
Rm. J 1-060
Washington, D.C. 20433, U.S.A.
1.202.458-5454
books@worldbank.org].




Annex V. Miscellaneous Annexes--Ad Hoc 
 
 
 
  Section IV. | Bid Document Home 
 


Footnotes:

16. Annex I applies to Quality-Based, Fixed-Budget and Least-Cost.  For Qualifications and Single-Source, it is replaced by a review of the strengths and weaknesses of the proposal, which may be amended by one or several evaluators.
17. Required for large contracts (see Guidelines).
18. Compare technical rank with rank in Form IVC.
19. Figure out technical scores with and without ¬タワlocal input¬タン (Form IIB).
20. Annex III applies to QCBS, Fixed-Budget, and Least-Cost.
21. Annex IV applies to all selection procedures (The Bank Standard Request for Proposals may be used for Qualifications and Single-Source, with appropriate modifications).




Permanent URL for this page: http://go.worldbank.org/XV32HMX2V0