Table 1.4: Projected share of irrigation expenditure to total capital outlay, Rs million   | 2005/06 | 2006/07 | 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | MWSIP | 200 | 366 | 385 | 338 | 262 | Irrigation sector (capital) | 24056 | 25709 | 27468 | 29330 | 31256 | IDCs (recurrent) | 10407 | 11448 | 12593 | 13852 | 15237 | ID (total) | 34,663 | 37,523 | 40,446 | 43,520 | 46,755 | State government capital outlay (projection) | 33390 | 38570 | 54120 | 57840 | 62120 | State government off-budget borrowing | 20000 | 20000 | 20000 | 20000 | 20000 | Total state government capital outlay | 53390 | 58570 | 74120 | 77840 | 82120 | Irrigation sector share | 63% | 66% | 73% | 74% | 76% | MWSIP share | 0.37% | 0.62% | 0.52% | 0.43% | 0.32% |
 Source: DoF,ID, State Government of Maharashtra data |
 The difficulty of providing irrigation with such a high share of the projected capital outlay is real. Although the share of MWSIP is very small (0.6% or less of the projected capital outlay) per year, it is critical for the ID to make a realistic reassessment of capital expenditures for itself and the IDCs, for example, in the range of 40 to 45 percent. The DoF shared the opinion that other ID projects needed to be scaled down in view of the financing constraint. The constraint may get tighter if the state government’s fiscal projections are not realized, as occurred in happened in the 2002/03 to 2004/05 MTFP.  Lessons Learned  The irrigation sector PER was an important tool for clarifying the fiscal impact of the project and helping to allay Bank management’s concerns regarding the availability of counterpart funding. The PER also confirmed the significant progress made by the state government in achieving full cost recovery of O&M expenditures and by the ID in achieving a better balance between maintenance work and staff costs. Notably, Maharashtra is the very first state in India to implement full cost recovery of O&M, and the PER helped to convince management of the project’s fiscal feasibility.  Although the PER was specific to the irrigation sector, colleagues specializing in macroeconomics were extremely important in supporting the analysis of statewide expenditure data, in facilitating access to DoF officials, and in pursuing the policy dialogue with them on the MTFRF and its links with development plans in the irrigation sector. This cross-sectoral collaboration also helped to build broader ownership of the project.  The PER also highlighted the importance of integrating expenditure information at the scheme level into the ID’s management information system. This integration will enable easier and more timely access to expenditure data, which can contribute to more effective policy making (for example, estimating O&M and formulating water rates), planning, and implementation.  | Country | India | | Project Name | Maharashtra Water Sector Improvement Project | | Project ID | P084790 | | Project Cost | US$5.9 million | | Dates | FY 2006 – FY 2012 | | Contact Point | R.S. Pathak World Bank Office, New Delhi, India Telephone: 5785+155 Email: rpathak@worldbank.org | Project Objectives | To strengthen the state’s capacity for multisectoral planning, development, and sustainable management of water resources and improve irrigation service delivery and productivity of irrigated agriculture. | Project Components | The project will assist the Government of Maharashtra in three key areas. It will support the strengthening of the state’s capacity for multisectoral planning, development, and sustainable management of water resources, particularly through the establishment of a state water resources regulatory authority and the transformation of the five Irrigation Development Corporations into river basin agencies. It will improve irrigation service delivery by creating water user associations (WUAs) in about 286 irrigation schemes and restructuring the Irrigation Department to enable greater user involvement in the management of surface irrigation systems. It will finance the rehabilitation of the 286 major, medium, and minor schemes that will be transferred to the WUAs. In addition, agricultural support services in the project area will be strengthened to improve the productivity of irrigated agriculture and the on-farm use of water. Finally, the project will support innovative approaches such as user-centered groundwater management pilots at the aquifer level, which will aim to foster more sustainable groundwater use, and pilots for commercial management of irigation schemes as an alternative institutional mechanism to improve irrigation service delivery and irrigated agriculture. |
|
 Â 
|