The PRSP process aims to make decision-making processes more transparent, participatory and pro-poor. For the PRSP process to bear fruit in this attempt, it needs to have an impact on budgeting processes and resource allocation. Although this is long-term endeavor, it is useful to examine evidence so far.
This session highlighted evidence from a series of case studies on the interaction between the PRSP process and the budget, as a basis for discussion. The five studies, Bolivia, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Vietnam and Tanzania aim to assess the extent to which public finance management and budget allocations reflect the principles and content of the PRSP, hence providing insights into progress in PRS implementation. The cases also shed light on whether the PRSP process itself has fostered more accountable, efficient and pro-poor budget processes and allocations.
Speakers: Rosa Alonso I Terme, EASPR and Jeni Klugman, AFTP2
Discussants: Stefano Paternostro, PRMPR; and Marcelo Andrade, AFTP4
The session was facilitated by Vera Wilhelm (PRMPR).
Presentations
Case Studies/Further Readings
Summary of the Discussion
Participants
Back to Poverty Reduction Strategy Implementation Series (PRSIS)
|