WelcomeWelcome to the Rural Institutions and Adaptation to Climate Change website. The objective of this website is to explore, discuss and pool information on how vulnerable populations cope with and adapt to climate change, and the role of local institutions in enhancing their capacity to adapt. This will be initiated through a Discussion Forum and will bring together practitioners, policy makers and the academic community to share information, best practice and experience on issues related to local institutions and climate change. Following the Discussion Forum, the website will continue to provide a repository of knowledge, and a platform for exchange of information on events, studies, institutions and experience relevant to this topic. This research is part of an ongoing TFESSD-funded study on Mobilizing Rural Institutions which examines how rural institutions affect governance and livelihood outcomes for different rural households in five transitional, developing country contexts: Afghanistan, Ethiopia, Orissa in India, Vietnam, and Yemen. (http://www.worldbank.org/mobilizinginstitutions) Climate change impacts on rural poor and their livelihoodsClimate change will have three main impacts on rural poor and their livelihoods: increase environmental risks, reduce livelihoods opportunities, and in consequence, stress existing social institutions. Its effect will occur through hazards and mechanisms that may be historically familiar, and for which the rural poor have often developed a rich repertoire of strategies and adaption practices. To strengthen the adaptive capacity of the rural poor, therefore, governments and other external actors need to strengthen and take advantage of already existing strategies that many households and social groups use collectively or singly. Examining the environmental risks that rural populations have historically faced, their cultural responses to these risks, and the institutional configurations that facilitate individual and collective adaptation strategies is therefore a fruitful area of inquiry and policy analysis for generating effective coordination with external interventions. The Role of Local Institutions in Adaptation to Climate ChangeThe responses of local institutions to climate change in developing countries will be a key part of the global response to both adaptation and mitigation. Information on how and under which conditions local institutions can help reduce climate change-related vulnerability, enhance adaptive capacity, and promote sustainable livelihoods through more effective development policies and programs is currently sparse. Understanding how local institutions respond will be critical to producing effective policy responses which effectively mobilize and assist local communities. All adaptation practices occur in institutionally rich contexts, and the success of adaptation depends on specific institutional arrangements. Local institutions are therefore necessary enablers of the capacity of households and social groups to deploy specific adaptation practices, and without them rural poor will find it far costlier to adapt in ways relevant to their needs. The framework proposed in this discussion forum suggests five major classes of adaptation practices that are available to the rural poor in varying measures depending on their social networks, access to resources, and asset portfolios: mobility, storage, diversification, communal pooling, and exchange. Given the importance of institutions to adaptation, it is critical to establish how different kinds of institutions reinforce particular combinations of adaptation practices. External interventions can reinforce livelihoods practices and local rural institutions by supplying four types of supports: informational, technological, financial, and leadership that reduces the costs of collective action. The framework also suggests that local institutions in the public, civic, and private sector are an appropriate mechanism to channel external inputs that strengthen the adaptation practices of the rural poor. Institutions and Livelihoods |
|---|
Institutions are humanly created formal and informal mechanisms that shape social and individual expectations, interactions, and behavior. They can be classified as falling into public (bureaucratic administrative units, and elected local governments), civic (membership and cooperative organizations), and private sectors (service and business organizations) (Uphoff and Buck 2007: 47). Understanding how local institutions and their organizational forms shape the adaptation practices of the rural poor, is important to craft external interventions that strengthen the adaptive capacity of the rural poor. Livelihoods comprise the capabilities and material and social assets necessary for a means of living (Chambers and Conway 1992). A sustainable livelihood includes the idea of coping with and recovery from external stresses so as to maintain or enhance existing capabilities and assets. The maintenance of capacities over time, and the conservation of the resource base for resource dependent populations, are also central to the definition of sustainable livelihoods (Ashley and Carney 1999, Norton and Foster 2001). |
| |
|---|
Key questions for discussion forum: - How can local institutions support local adaptation practices across communities?
- What are the limits to adaptation to climate change through rural institutions?
- Is climate risk adaptation also simply good development?
- What should be the key priorities of aid organizations when providing support for climate adaptation?
- What can aid organizations learn from rural households' historical efforts to cope with environmental risks?
- How can aid interventions best facilitate improved adaptive capacity of the poor?
- What are the likely implications of climate change for the functioning of rural institutions?
- Can existing local institutions be strengthened to serve new objectives related to the reinforcement of adaptive practices, eg to enhance participation, democratic local governance, and accountability?
- How can the relationship between rural institutions and adaptation practices be identified and stated more precisely?
- What inputs can external interventions channel to rural areas to enhance adaptive capacity, and how can these interventions and inputs be linked more explicitly and effectively to the way rural institutions function?
|
|
|